René's URL Explorer Experiment

Title: Adding type stubs · Issue #448 · msgpack/msgpack-python · GitHub

Open Graph Title: Adding type stubs · Issue #448 · msgpack/msgpack-python

X Title: Adding type stubs · Issue #448 · msgpack/msgpack-python

Description: In the course of using msgpack in a project I've written some basic type stubs for the parts of the API I'm using. I don't think it would be too hard to fill out the type stubs for the rest of the API. Would you accept a PR adding stub f...

Open Graph Description: In the course of using msgpack in a project I've written some basic type stubs for the parts of the API I'm using. I don't think it would be too hard to fill out the type stubs for the rest of the ...

X Description: In the course of using msgpack in a project I've written some basic type stubs for the parts of the API I'm using. I don't think it would be too hard to fill out the type stubs for the ...

Opengraph URL: https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-python/issues/448

X: @github

direct link

Domain: redirect.github.com

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"Adding type stubs","articleBody":"In the course of using msgpack in a project I've written some basic type stubs for the parts of the API I'm using.\r\nI don't think it would be too hard to fill out the type stubs for the rest of the API.\r\n\r\nWould you accept a PR adding stub files to the package?\r\nNot sure if you have a preference on adding the types to the code itself or keeping them as separate stub files.\r\n\r\nrelated: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0561/\r\n\r\n","author":{"url":"https://github.com/sbdchd","@type":"Person","name":"sbdchd"},"datePublished":"2020-12-11T04:36:30.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":10},"url":"https://github.com/448/msgpack-python/issues/448"}

Links:

Viewport: width=device-width