Title: the move from `20.04` to `24.04` seems to be breaking a lot of things · Issue #308 · linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy · GitHub
Open Graph Title: the move from `20.04` to `24.04` seems to be breaking a lot of things · Issue #308 · linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy
X Title: the move from `20.04` to `24.04` seems to be breaking a lot of things · Issue #308 · linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy
Description: https://github.com/HarbourMasters uses linuxdeploy to package appimages, and we've always used the continuous release. as of c28054b multiple problems have popped up: someone reported getting execv error: No such file or directory someon...
Open Graph Description: https://github.com/HarbourMasters uses linuxdeploy to package appimages, and we've always used the continuous release. as of c28054b multiple problems have popped up: someone reported getting execv...
X Description: https://github.com/HarbourMasters uses linuxdeploy to package appimages, and we've always used the continuous release. as of c28054b multiple problems have popped up: someone reported getting e...
Opengraph URL: https://github.com/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy/issues/308
X: @github
Domain: patch-diff.githubusercontent.com
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"the move from `20.04` to `24.04` seems to be breaking a lot of things","articleBody":"https://github.com/HarbourMasters uses `linuxdeploy` to package appimages, and we've always used the `continuous` release. as of https://github.com/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy/commit/c28054bab6623e72e0e27ffec88c41df5ce46667 multiple problems have popped up:\n* someone reported getting `execv error: No such file or directory`\n* someone reported crashes coming out of sleep mode on their steam deck\n\ni forked the repo, pushed https://github.com/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy/commit/827d1abc073e4f20cb854923b8320c71ca587f8a to my fork, and kicked off a ci build for the person getting the steam deck crashes to test. they were unable to reproduce the crashes with that change.\n\ni know that github is retiring the `20.04` runners, so reverting to those doesn't seem like a reasonable solution.\n\nso i'd like to propose what feels like a reasonable workaround to me: would it be possible to tag/create a release for the most recent version before https://github.com/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy/commit/c28054bab6623e72e0e27ffec88c41df5ce46667?\n\nedit: the name on https://github.com/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy/releases/tag/1-alpha-20250213-1 threw me off, i see that is likely exactly what i'm looking for\n\nedit 2: i now see that there's a *tag* for https://github.com/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy/releases/tag/1-alpha-20250213-1 but not a *release*. if a release could be created that would be huge!","author":{"url":"https://github.com/briaguya0","@type":"Person","name":"briaguya0"},"datePublished":"2025-02-15T07:37:31.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":12},"url":"https://github.com/308/linuxdeploy/issues/308"}
| route-pattern | /_view_fragments/issues/show/:user_id/:repository/:id/issue_layout(.:format) |
| route-controller | voltron_issues_fragments |
| route-action | issue_layout |
| fetch-nonce | v2:896925d6-c189-7692-5f12-d724f556cdee |
| current-catalog-service-hash | 81bb79d38c15960b92d99bca9288a9108c7a47b18f2423d0f6438c5b7bcd2114 |
| request-id | 86F4:28F9BD:3334EF2:44EE145:69706DA0 |
| html-safe-nonce | 55ca2974605f49855882b0a7298799ae5c5ff378ca92ce7d8ff70988e9f2360b |
| visitor-payload | eyJyZWZlcnJlciI6IiIsInJlcXVlc3RfaWQiOiI4NkY0OjI4RjlCRDozMzM0RUYyOjQ0RUUxNDU6Njk3MDZEQTAiLCJ2aXNpdG9yX2lkIjoiMTg0MzI3MzQwOTcwNTgzMTg0MCIsInJlZ2lvbl9lZGdlIjoiaWFkIiwicmVnaW9uX3JlbmRlciI6ImlhZCJ9 |
| visitor-hmac | bebee5e7734500cab47a5ea3b4ed0da7eb3eb4f7fbcbd8ab9bba12e094ca2ed6 |
| hovercard-subject-tag | issue:2855308335 |
| github-keyboard-shortcuts | repository,issues,copilot |
| google-site-verification | Apib7-x98H0j5cPqHWwSMm6dNU4GmODRoqxLiDzdx9I |
| octolytics-url | https://collector.github.com/github/collect |
| analytics-location | / |
| fb:app_id | 1401488693436528 |
| apple-itunes-app | app-id=1477376905, app-argument=https://github.com/_view_fragments/issues/show/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy/308/issue_layout |
| twitter:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/e2a548b92ba9968ad517bb2f81a0322497cb8d28ce5ca99f3bb05d31087d6883/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy/issues/308 |
| twitter:card | summary_large_image |
| og:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/e2a548b92ba9968ad517bb2f81a0322497cb8d28ce5ca99f3bb05d31087d6883/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy/issues/308 |
| og:image:alt | https://github.com/HarbourMasters uses linuxdeploy to package appimages, and we've always used the continuous release. as of c28054b multiple problems have popped up: someone reported getting execv... |
| og:image:width | 1200 |
| og:image:height | 600 |
| og:site_name | GitHub |
| og:type | object |
| og:author:username | briaguya0 |
| hostname | github.com |
| expected-hostname | github.com |
| None | 9920a62ba22d06470388e2904804fb7e5ec51c9e35f81784e9191394c74b2bd2 |
| turbo-cache-control | no-preview |
| go-import | github.com/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy git https://github.com/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy.git |
| octolytics-dimension-user_id | 41347406 |
| octolytics-dimension-user_login | linuxdeploy |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_id | 134625865 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_nwo | linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_public | true |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_is_fork | false |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_id | 134625865 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_nwo | linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy |
| turbo-body-classes | logged-out env-production page-responsive |
| disable-turbo | false |
| browser-stats-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/stats |
| browser-errors-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/errors |
| release | 7d6181066430cc06553c8396ca201e194ae33cb9 |
| ui-target | full |
| theme-color | #1e2327 |
| color-scheme | light dark |
Links:
Viewport: width=device-width