Title: Missing merge command · Issue #118 · gitonomy/gitlib · GitHub
Open Graph Title: Missing merge command · Issue #118 · gitonomy/gitlib
X Title: Missing merge command · Issue #118 · gitonomy/gitlib
Description: Is there a reason that there is no implementation for git merge? If no reason, would you be open for a PR adding this behavior?
Open Graph Description: Is there a reason that there is no implementation for git merge? If no reason, would you be open for a PR adding this behavior?
X Description: Is there a reason that there is no implementation for git merge? If no reason, would you be open for a PR adding this behavior?
Opengraph URL: https://github.com/gitonomy/gitlib/issues/118
X: @github
Domain: patch-diff.githubusercontent.com
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"Missing merge command","articleBody":"Is there a reason that there is no implementation for git merge? If no reason, would you be open for a PR adding this behavior?\n","author":{"url":"https://github.com/acrobat","@type":"Person","name":"acrobat"},"datePublished":"2016-10-16T19:56:33.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":1},"url":"https://github.com/118/gitlib/issues/118"}
| route-pattern | /_view_fragments/issues/show/:user_id/:repository/:id/issue_layout(.:format) |
| route-controller | voltron_issues_fragments |
| route-action | issue_layout |
| fetch-nonce | v2:9235319a-b910-7367-383a-6e0a4ea0f6be |
| current-catalog-service-hash | 81bb79d38c15960b92d99bca9288a9108c7a47b18f2423d0f6438c5b7bcd2114 |
| request-id | D06E:140E58:5C39619:776BB24:6975428F |
| html-safe-nonce | 01693fd66c649a3fe9cf3cc2dd745c2904d59e043c1dcb885a0ece4616160c68 |
| visitor-payload | eyJyZWZlcnJlciI6IiIsInJlcXVlc3RfaWQiOiJEMDZFOjE0MEU1ODo1QzM5NjE5Ojc3NkJCMjQ6Njk3NTQyOEYiLCJ2aXNpdG9yX2lkIjoiNjg4MzU1NjI3NjE4NTY3ODQ3OSIsInJlZ2lvbl9lZGdlIjoiaWFkIiwicmVnaW9uX3JlbmRlciI6ImlhZCJ9 |
| visitor-hmac | caea2d876affd8af3719585c34913c3c46bf11707f319df18e7251e409fc9488 |
| hovercard-subject-tag | issue:183287664 |
| github-keyboard-shortcuts | repository,issues,copilot |
| google-site-verification | Apib7-x98H0j5cPqHWwSMm6dNU4GmODRoqxLiDzdx9I |
| octolytics-url | https://collector.github.com/github/collect |
| analytics-location | / |
| fb:app_id | 1401488693436528 |
| apple-itunes-app | app-id=1477376905, app-argument=https://github.com/_view_fragments/issues/show/gitonomy/gitlib/118/issue_layout |
| twitter:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/6a2d5bc43af16a6c8a8b53fcc4db34ec087b7143b43ee3ab6b9c353d963c66a2/gitonomy/gitlib/issues/118 |
| twitter:card | summary_large_image |
| og:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/6a2d5bc43af16a6c8a8b53fcc4db34ec087b7143b43ee3ab6b9c353d963c66a2/gitonomy/gitlib/issues/118 |
| og:image:alt | Is there a reason that there is no implementation for git merge? If no reason, would you be open for a PR adding this behavior? |
| og:image:width | 1200 |
| og:image:height | 600 |
| og:site_name | GitHub |
| og:type | object |
| og:author:username | acrobat |
| hostname | github.com |
| expected-hostname | github.com |
| None | 4a4bf5f4e28041a9d2e5c107d7d20b78b4294ba261cab243b28167c16a623a1f |
| turbo-cache-control | no-preview |
| go-import | github.com/gitonomy/gitlib git https://github.com/gitonomy/gitlib.git |
| octolytics-dimension-user_id | 2288721 |
| octolytics-dimension-user_login | gitonomy |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_id | 5709354 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_nwo | gitonomy/gitlib |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_public | true |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_is_fork | false |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_id | 5709354 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_nwo | gitonomy/gitlib |
| turbo-body-classes | logged-out env-production page-responsive |
| disable-turbo | false |
| browser-stats-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/stats |
| browser-errors-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/errors |
| release | 488b30e96dfd057fbbe44c6665ccbc030b729dde |
| ui-target | full |
| theme-color | #1e2327 |
| color-scheme | light dark |
Links:
Viewport: width=device-width