René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"Write function doesn't take into account quality","articleBody":"Hello there!\r\nI'm trying to do some speed tests writting encoded images to disk playing with jpeg quality factor.\r\nI'm using the python wrapper for NvJpeg_write as follows:\r\n```\r\nfoo = nj.write('test.jpg', raw, quality)\r\nprint(foo)\r\n```\r\nI have tried with quality = [10, 70, 90] but I'm always obtaining the same buffer/file size (217936 for my case)\r\n\r\nRegardless, when I directly use the NvJpeg_encode wrapper I achieve to get the proper sizes:\r\n```\r\nbar = nj.encode(raw, quality)\r\nprint(len(bar))\r\n# 53096 for quality=10, 217936 for quality=70 and 447357 for quality=95\r\n```\r\n\r\nI've looked at the source code and it seems that NvJpeg_write just calls NvJpeg_encode and passes the arguments, but I'm not used at all to C code, so I'm probably missing out something.\r\n\r\nCan anyone lend me a hand?","author":{"url":"https://github.com/manuelporta","@type":"Person","name":"manuelporta"},"datePublished":"2024-03-04T10:06:15.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":0},"url":"https://github.com/21/nvjpeg-python/issues/21"}