René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"Documentation standard?","articleBody":"I notice that docstrings of functions and classes are a bit confusing. And issue #94 points out that there isn't really a built in documentation for the objects returned by the api calls. \r\n\r\nAfter looking at various popular python libraries out there, it seems like a lot of them follows the Numpy/Scipy docstring [documentation style](https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/master/doc/HOWTO_DOCUMENT.rst.txt#docstring-standard).\r\n\r\n@ocefpaf will set up ODM2PythonAPI documentation to follow a similar approach to [Folium](http://python-visualization.github.io/folium/docs-master/). Looking at the code it seems like this library also follows the numpy/scipy documentation style (@ocefpaf, please correct me if I'm wrong).\r\n\r\nGiven those circumstances, I propose that we use the numpy/scipy standard when documenting the code. What do you all think? @emiliom @ocefpaf @aufdenkampe @horsburgh @sreeder ?","author":{"url":"https://github.com/lsetiawan","@type":"Person","name":"lsetiawan"},"datePublished":"2017-09-27T22:45:18.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":2},"url":"https://github.com/97/ODM2PythonAPI/issues/97"}