René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"Evaluate also getter from classes","articleBody":"\u003c!--\r\nNOTE: THIS PROJECT IS NOT BEING ACTIVELY MAINTAINED.\r\n\r\nYou can file a suggestion in case someone decides to work on it.\r\n\r\nHowever, any proposed syntax changes will most likely be required to\r\nfirst go through standardization for consistency with other jsonpath\r\nimplementatioins.\r\n\r\nSee https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath/issues/124 .\r\n--\u003e\r\n\r\nCould be related to https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath/issues/174\r\n\r\n## Motivation\r\n\r\n\u003c!-- What would be the purpose of this new feature? --\u003e\r\n\r\nCurrently the `getter` from classes, that encapsulate fields, are not \"visible\" to the library, so it is not possible to get a value from getter property. Becase getter are \"seen\" from developer as readonly fields, the library should at least also be able to \"read\" them.\r\n\r\n## Current behavior\r\n\r\n\u003c!-- If this is to enhance an existing rule, how does the rule\r\n   currently behave in regard to the new changes? --\u003e\r\n\r\ngetter are ignored\r\n\r\n## Desired behavior\r\n\r\n\u003c!-- What would you like to see happen instead? --\u003e\r\n\r\nThe getters should be evaluated exactly the same as pure fields in classes.\r\n\r\n## Code example\r\n\r\n```js\r\nimport { JSONPath } from 'jsonpath-plus';\r\n\r\nclass TestData {\r\n  #value;\r\n  \r\n  constructor(value) {\r\n    this.#value = value;\r\n  }\r\n\r\n  get value() {\r\n    return this.#value;\r\n  }\r\n\r\n  toJSON() {\r\n    return { jsonValue: this.value };\r\n  }\r\n\r\n  someValue = 33;\r\n}\r\n\r\nconst data = new TestData(11);\r\nconsole.log(data); // TestData {someValue: 33}\r\nconsole.log(data.value); // 11\r\nconsole.log(data['value']); // 11\r\nconsole.log(JSON.stringify(data)); // {\"jsonValue\":11}\r\n\r\nconst val = JSONPath({ path: '$.value', json: data });\r\nconst val1 = JSONPath({ path: '$.jsonValue', json: data });\r\nconst val2 = JSONPath({ path: '$.#value', json: data });\r\nconst val3 = JSONPath({ path: '$.someValue', json: data });\r\n\r\nconsole.log(val); // [] - expected [11]\r\nconsole.log(val1); // []\r\nconsole.log(val2); // []\r\nconsole.log(val3); // [33]\r\n\r\nconsole.log(Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(data, 'value')); // false\r\nconsole.log('value' in data); // true\r\n```\r\n","author":{"url":"https://github.com/WebDucer","@type":"Person","name":"WebDucer"},"datePublished":"2022-08-19T14:15:06.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":1},"url":"https://github.com/177/JSONPath/issues/177"}