Title: Rework annotations to use JSON instead of UDTs · utPLSQL/utPLSQL · Discussion #1367 · GitHub
Open Graph Title: Rework annotations to use JSON instead of UDTs · utPLSQL/utPLSQL · Discussion #1367
X Title: Rework annotations to use JSON instead of UDTs · utPLSQL/utPLSQL · Discussion #1367
Description: Rework annotations to use JSON instead of UDTs
Open Graph Description: Problem or motivation Annotations are currently defined, searched, and filtered via PL/SQL object types. Proposed solution This discussion is proposing a move to JSON so annotation data is easier t...
X Description: Problem or motivation Annotations are currently defined, searched, and filtered via PL/SQL object types. Proposed solution This discussion is proposing a move to JSON so annotation data is easier t...
Opengraph URL: https://github.com/utPLSQL/utPLSQL/discussions/1367
X: @github
Domain: github.com
| route-pattern | /_view_fragments/Voltron::DiscussionsFragmentsController/show/:user_id/:repository/:discussion_number/discussion_layout(.:format) |
| route-controller | voltron_discussions_fragments |
| route-action | discussion_layout |
| fetch-nonce | v2:05bd2655-4217-026b-f8e3-e7673452ea9c |
| current-catalog-service-hash | 9f0abe34da433c9b6db74bffa2466494a717b579a96b30a5d252e5090baea7be |
| request-id | C5F2:3B1AF1:2BDD83A:3FF2EBD:6A60E4F7 |
| html-safe-nonce | 3c547006e57a9dc895998d000c01c6cfa91b9208d1e6719944c4602d34ea2e10 |
| visitor-payload | eyJyZWZlcnJlciI6IiIsInJlcXVlc3RfaWQiOiJDNUYyOjNCMUFGMToyQkREODNBOjNGRjJFQkQ6NkE2MEU0RjciLCJ2aXNpdG9yX2lkIjoiODI1NzYyODgyMDg1OTgzOTczNSIsInJlZ2lvbl9lZGdlIjoiaWFkIiwicmVnaW9uX3JlbmRlciI6ImlhZCJ9 |
| visitor-hmac | fc7032776d8f2e15b16d110c67801f958909bd5dcbf3cf7f9d708906be9100ed |
| hovercard-subject-tag | discussion:10450776 |
| github-keyboard-shortcuts | repository,copilot |
| google-site-verification | Apib7-x98H0j5cPqHWwSMm6dNU4GmODRoqxLiDzdx9I |
| octolytics-url | https://collector.github.com/github/collect |
| analytics-location | / |
| fb:app_id | 1401488693436528 |
| apple-itunes-app | app-id=1477376905, app-argument=https://github.com/_view_fragments/Voltron::DiscussionsFragmentsController/show/utPLSQL/utPLSQL/1367/discussion_layout |
| twitter:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/ed99ff3d75c9c57486938991ce1534b7fe14e951894c829ef84eaae588e20959/utPLSQL/utPLSQL/discussions/1367 |
| twitter:card | summary_large_image |
| og:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/ed99ff3d75c9c57486938991ce1534b7fe14e951894c829ef84eaae588e20959/utPLSQL/utPLSQL/discussions/1367 |
| og:image:alt | Problem or motivation Annotations are currently defined, searched, and filtered via PL/SQL object types. Proposed solution This discussion is proposing a move to JSON so annotation data is easier t... |
| og:image:width | 1200 |
| og:image:height | 600 |
| og:site_name | GitHub |
| og:type | object |
| hostname | github.com |
| expected-hostname | github.com |
| None | 1957f194e271fe30a03dc862496c17190cace7b76c3327faf05645d99ab7da7b |
| turbo-cache-control | no-preview |
| go-import | github.com/utPLSQL/utPLSQL git https://github.com/utPLSQL/utPLSQL.git |
| octolytics-dimension-user_id | 15661281 |
| octolytics-dimension-user_login | utPLSQL |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_id | 50728220 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_nwo | utPLSQL/utPLSQL |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_public | true |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_is_fork | false |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_id | 50728220 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_nwo | utPLSQL/utPLSQL |
| turbo-body-classes | logged-out env-production page-responsive |
| disable-turbo | false |
| browser-stats-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/stats |
| browser-errors-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/errors |
| release | ce4ea0e3ce641f8f789b539253752038d78f1cfe |
| ui-target | full |
| theme-color | #1e2327 |
| color-scheme | light dark |
Links:
Viewport: width=device-width