René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"ClusterRoles and ClusterRoleBindings: `metadata.name` too common","articleBody":"## ➹ New Feature implementation request\r\n\r\nA minor detail to fix possible nameconflict in non-namespaced resources.\r\n\r\n### Is your feature request related to a problem?\r\n\r\n`ClusterRoles` and `ClusterRolesBindings` are not bound to any namespace. The `metadata.name` (`manager-role` and `manager-rolebinding`) of `ClusterRoles` and `ClusterRolesBindings` are too common and could cause nameconflicts. (happened in my cluster with another project)\r\n\r\n### Describe the solution you'd like\r\nChange the names to `securecodebox-manager-role` and `securecodebox-manager-rolebinding`.\r\n\r\n### Describe alternatives you've considered\r\n\r\n1) A solution is to use kustomize to deploy the helm chart and patch the respective fields. However, this is overly complicated when the name can just be initialy fixed.\r\n\r\n### Additional context\r\n\u003c!-- Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here. --\u003e\r\n","author":{"url":"https://github.com/LittaKake","@type":"Person","name":"LittaKake"},"datePublished":"2024-08-16T11:27:19.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":1},"url":"https://github.com/2621/secureCodeBox/issues/2621"}