Title: Add timestamp to findings which shows the Scans creation time · Issue #1109 · secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox · GitHub
Open Graph Title: Add timestamp to findings which shows the Scans creation time · Issue #1109 · secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox
X Title: Add timestamp to findings which shows the Scans creation time · Issue #1109 · secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox
Description: Discussed in #1100 Originally posted by ammerzon April 11, 2022 The finding documentation states that the identified_at attribute will often not be present. This information would be quite useful, and I wonder why it is not present more?...
Open Graph Description: Discussed in #1100 Originally posted by ammerzon April 11, 2022 The finding documentation states that the identified_at attribute will often not be present. This information would be quite useful, ...
X Description: Discussed in #1100 Originally posted by ammerzon April 11, 2022 The finding documentation states that the identified_at attribute will often not be present. This information would be quite useful, ...
Opengraph URL: https://github.com/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox/issues/1109
X: @github
Domain: github.com
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"Add timestamp to findings which shows the Scans creation time","articleBody":"### Discussed in https://github.com/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox/discussions/1100\r\n\r\n\u003cdiv type='discussions-op-text'\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003csup\u003eOriginally posted by **ammerzon** April 11, 2022\u003c/sup\u003e\r\nThe [finding documentation](https://www.securecodebox.io/docs/api/finding) states that the `identified_at` attribute will often not be present. This information would be quite useful, and I wonder why it is not present more?\r\n\r\nI assume this depends on the scanner, and there is no easy way to get to that information. Wouldn't it be helpful to get an attribute `started_at` for the scan so you have a duration with the already existing `parsed_at` attribute?\u003c/div\u003e\r\n\r\n\r\nEasiest thing to do would probably be to just add this under the proposed `scan_created_at` attribute, but we might want to add some more structure to it and have a `scan` attribute which bundles more metadata related info about the scan?\r\n\r\nLike:\r\n\r\n```yaml\r\n{\r\n \"name\": \"http\",\r\n \"description\": \"Port 3000 is open using tcp protocol.\",\r\n ...\r\n \"severity\": \"INFORMATIONAL\",\r\n // new field\r\n \"scan\": {\r\n \"created_at\": \"2021-06-22T12:26:54.378Z\",\r\n \"name\": \"foobar\",\r\n \"namespace\": \"default\",\r\n \"scan_type\": \"nmap\"\r\n },\r\n \"attributes\": {\r\n \"port\": 3000,\r\n ...\r\n }\r\n}\r\n```","author":{"url":"https://github.com/J12934","@type":"Person","name":"J12934"},"datePublished":"2022-04-12T18:08:39.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":1},"url":"https://github.com/1109/secureCodeBox/issues/1109"}
| route-pattern | /_view_fragments/issues/show/:user_id/:repository/:id/issue_layout(.:format) |
| route-controller | voltron_issues_fragments |
| route-action | issue_layout |
| fetch-nonce | v2:0dcac0a4-ee70-eadb-8ff4-de247ac4c745 |
| current-catalog-service-hash | 81bb79d38c15960b92d99bca9288a9108c7a47b18f2423d0f6438c5b7bcd2114 |
| request-id | A066:12B481:2AE59BA:36F4202:6990329D |
| html-safe-nonce | 9beac6027caa872a6e6e1aaf63224091a8c4d83df15c9b3746d33fb1275a73d9 |
| visitor-payload | eyJyZWZlcnJlciI6IiIsInJlcXVlc3RfaWQiOiJBMDY2OjEyQjQ4MToyQUU1OUJBOjM2RjQyMDI6Njk5MDMyOUQiLCJ2aXNpdG9yX2lkIjoiODA2OTM4MjY1NDgyNTM0NTY5NCIsInJlZ2lvbl9lZGdlIjoiaWFkIiwicmVnaW9uX3JlbmRlciI6ImlhZCJ9 |
| visitor-hmac | cc7a6ca524e0b56c069fe6d360156b5da54dbdc069c31de4b63f44669a3f24bb |
| hovercard-subject-tag | issue:1202219187 |
| github-keyboard-shortcuts | repository,issues,copilot |
| google-site-verification | Apib7-x98H0j5cPqHWwSMm6dNU4GmODRoqxLiDzdx9I |
| octolytics-url | https://collector.github.com/github/collect |
| analytics-location | / |
| fb:app_id | 1401488693436528 |
| apple-itunes-app | app-id=1477376905, app-argument=https://github.com/_view_fragments/issues/show/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox/1109/issue_layout |
| twitter:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/97a7b2aa720cc8dee6de9cfa245165df656027d99e7a3caacbc1e8793481c8d8/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox/issues/1109 |
| twitter:card | summary_large_image |
| og:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/97a7b2aa720cc8dee6de9cfa245165df656027d99e7a3caacbc1e8793481c8d8/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox/issues/1109 |
| og:image:alt | Discussed in #1100 Originally posted by ammerzon April 11, 2022 The finding documentation states that the identified_at attribute will often not be present. This information would be quite useful, ... |
| og:image:width | 1200 |
| og:image:height | 600 |
| og:site_name | GitHub |
| og:type | object |
| og:author:username | J12934 |
| hostname | github.com |
| expected-hostname | github.com |
| None | 42c603b9d642c4a9065a51770f75e5e27132fef0e858607f5c9cb7e422831a7b |
| turbo-cache-control | no-preview |
| go-import | github.com/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox git https://github.com/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox.git |
| octolytics-dimension-user_id | 34573705 |
| octolytics-dimension-user_login | secureCodeBox |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_id | 80711933 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_nwo | secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_public | true |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_is_fork | false |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_id | 80711933 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_nwo | secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox |
| turbo-body-classes | logged-out env-production page-responsive |
| disable-turbo | false |
| browser-stats-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/stats |
| browser-errors-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/errors |
| release | 3b33c5aedc9808f45bc5fcf0b1e4404cf749dac7 |
| ui-target | full |
| theme-color | #1e2327 |
| color-scheme | light dark |
Links:
Viewport: width=device-width