Title: identifiedAt attribute often not present · secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox · Discussion #1100 · GitHub
Open Graph Title: identifiedAt attribute often not present · secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox · Discussion #1100
X Title: identifiedAt attribute often not present · secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox · Discussion #1100
Description: identifiedAt attribute often not present
Open Graph Description: The finding documentation states that the identified_at attribute will often not be present. This information would be quite useful, and I wonder why it is not present more? I assume this depends o...
X Description: The finding documentation states that the identified_at attribute will often not be present. This information would be quite useful, and I wonder why it is not present more? I assume this depends o...
Opengraph URL: https://github.com/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox/discussions/1100
X: @github
Domain: github.com
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"QAPage","mainEntity":{"@type":"Question","name":"identifiedAt attribute often not present","text":"The finding documentation states that the identified_at attribute will often not be present. This information would be quite useful, and I wonder why it is not present more?
\nI assume this depends on the scanner, and there is no easy way to get to that information. Wouldn't it be helpful to get an attribute started_at for the scan so you have a duration with the already existing parsed_at attribute?
","upvoteCount":2,"answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yup totally agree that identified_at is usually the more interesting, but as you said we can only really set it if the scanner / the scanners result format includes it.
\nThe scan currently doesn't really have a started_at timestamp, but all kubernetes objects have a creationTimestamp set. (metadata.creationTimestamp). This isn't necessarily the timestamp of the actual start of the scan as it might have been in a pending state if the cluster was currently unable to execute it, but it is usually relativly close.
","upvoteCount":2,"url":"https://github.com/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox/discussions/1100#discussioncomment-2547228"}}}| route-pattern | /_view_fragments/Voltron::DiscussionsFragmentsController/show/:user_id/:repository/:discussion_number/discussion_layout(.:format) |
| route-controller | voltron_discussions_fragments |
| route-action | discussion_layout |
| fetch-nonce | v2:4fbc05cc-86bc-0e78-7599-2b6773de7011 |
| current-catalog-service-hash | 9f0abe34da433c9b6db74bffa2466494a717b579a96b30a5d252e5090baea7be |
| request-id | C464:17AEA1:93BC29:C0EAAB:6990AFAD |
| html-safe-nonce | b6acb2f7fc33a44eef687c5bd3d8bf8157276d2ebc87f9446fdff8ce4bcc6689 |
| visitor-payload | eyJyZWZlcnJlciI6IiIsInJlcXVlc3RfaWQiOiJDNDY0OjE3QUVBMTo5M0JDMjk6QzBFQUFCOjY5OTBBRkFEIiwidmlzaXRvcl9pZCI6IjUyNzgzOTE0MzAwODQ0ODQyOSIsInJlZ2lvbl9lZGdlIjoiaWFkIiwicmVnaW9uX3JlbmRlciI6ImlhZCJ9 |
| visitor-hmac | a6d98bee85bce7072404f4048799c383007af8c35841b53a91b416c7352d1337 |
| hovercard-subject-tag | discussion:4001225 |
| github-keyboard-shortcuts | repository,copilot |
| google-site-verification | Apib7-x98H0j5cPqHWwSMm6dNU4GmODRoqxLiDzdx9I |
| octolytics-url | https://collector.github.com/github/collect |
| analytics-location | / |
| fb:app_id | 1401488693436528 |
| apple-itunes-app | app-id=1477376905, app-argument=https://github.com/_view_fragments/Voltron::DiscussionsFragmentsController/show/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox/1100/discussion_layout |
| twitter:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/c4f6c124f06880f9d17419b3bed10456cd3b46e12d2ce7dce8b2e14e2c6d7f48/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox/discussions/1100 |
| twitter:card | summary_large_image |
| og:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/c4f6c124f06880f9d17419b3bed10456cd3b46e12d2ce7dce8b2e14e2c6d7f48/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox/discussions/1100 |
| og:image:alt | The finding documentation states that the identified_at attribute will often not be present. This information would be quite useful, and I wonder why it is not present more? I assume this depends o... |
| og:image:width | 1200 |
| og:image:height | 600 |
| og:site_name | GitHub |
| og:type | object |
| hostname | github.com |
| expected-hostname | github.com |
| None | 42c603b9d642c4a9065a51770f75e5e27132fef0e858607f5c9cb7e422831a7b |
| turbo-cache-control | no-preview |
| go-import | github.com/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox git https://github.com/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox.git |
| octolytics-dimension-user_id | 34573705 |
| octolytics-dimension-user_login | secureCodeBox |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_id | 80711933 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_nwo | secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_public | true |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_is_fork | false |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_id | 80711933 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_nwo | secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox |
| turbo-body-classes | logged-out env-production page-responsive |
| disable-turbo | false |
| browser-stats-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/stats |
| browser-errors-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/errors |
| release | 848bc6032dcc93a9a7301dcc3f379a72ba13b96e |
| ui-target | full |
| theme-color | #1e2327 |
| color-scheme | light dark |
Links:
Viewport: width=device-width