Title: Removed unnecessary dictionary initialization in CLRObject by lostmsu · Pull Request #1413 · pythonnet/pythonnet · GitHub
Open Graph Title: Removed unnecessary dictionary initialization in CLRObject by lostmsu · Pull Request #1413 · pythonnet/pythonnet
X Title: Removed unnecessary dictionary initialization in CLRObject by lostmsu · Pull Request #1413 · pythonnet/pythonnet
Description: I don't see any reason for it to be present. The code does not have any associated comments, and I was not able to hit it running our tests. Any proper access to ob_dict should be going through PyObject_GenericGetDict, which initializes ob_dict if necessary.
Open Graph Description: I don't see any reason for it to be present. The code does not have any associated comments, and I was not able to hit it running our tests. Any proper access to ob_dict should be going through...
X Description: I don't see any reason for it to be present. The code does not have any associated comments, and I was not able to hit it running our tests. Any proper access to ob_dict should be going thr...
Opengraph URL: https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet/pull/1413
X: @github
Domain: github.com
| route-pattern | /:user_id/:repository/pull/:id/files(.:format) |
| route-controller | pull_requests |
| route-action | files |
| fetch-nonce | v2:89602ef3-139c-f2f5-583b-279c39397988 |
| current-catalog-service-hash | ae870bc5e265a340912cde392f23dad3671a0a881730ffdadd82f2f57d81641b |
| request-id | 8FF6:263AB0:FD087B:14C2D85:69717EB1 |
| html-safe-nonce | 8476930d605024f23ad2da5815c30d829fe3c1679b2e858221f261a1de66b422 |
| visitor-payload | eyJyZWZlcnJlciI6IiIsInJlcXVlc3RfaWQiOiI4RkY2OjI2M0FCMDpGRDA4N0I6MTRDMkQ4NTo2OTcxN0VCMSIsInZpc2l0b3JfaWQiOiIyMjU2NTM3MzY2MjQ1MjQ0NTkzIiwicmVnaW9uX2VkZ2UiOiJpYWQiLCJyZWdpb25fcmVuZGVyIjoiaWFkIn0= |
| visitor-hmac | ed0cbb8ef297061c586c99db85456cf60fbc726447a938145ef37575fb4a52c4 |
| hovercard-subject-tag | pull_request:588927150 |
| github-keyboard-shortcuts | repository,pull-request-list,pull-request-conversation,pull-request-files-changed,copilot |
| google-site-verification | Apib7-x98H0j5cPqHWwSMm6dNU4GmODRoqxLiDzdx9I |
| octolytics-url | https://collector.github.com/github/collect |
| analytics-location | / |
| fb:app_id | 1401488693436528 |
| apple-itunes-app | app-id=1477376905, app-argument=https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet/pull/1413/files |
| twitter:image | https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/239520?s=400&v=4 |
| twitter:card | summary_large_image |
| og:image | https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/239520?s=400&v=4 |
| og:image:alt | I don't see any reason for it to be present. The code does not have any associated comments, and I was not able to hit it running our tests. Any proper access to ob_dict should be going through... |
| og:site_name | GitHub |
| og:type | object |
| hostname | github.com |
| expected-hostname | github.com |
| None | 83f241b6f7605f8428e9ff3118ca968f3a377f07904e088dfd9465a7c12cc367 |
| turbo-cache-control | no-preview |
| diff-view | unified |
| go-import | github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet git https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet.git |
| octolytics-dimension-user_id | 6050430 |
| octolytics-dimension-user_login | pythonnet |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_id | 14748123 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_nwo | pythonnet/pythonnet |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_public | true |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_is_fork | false |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_id | 14748123 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_nwo | pythonnet/pythonnet |
| turbo-body-classes | logged-out env-production page-responsive |
| disable-turbo | true |
| browser-stats-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/stats |
| browser-errors-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/errors |
| release | 742da896705f64f8f87756c8e5cc3175bdbeb85e |
| ui-target | full |
| theme-color | #1e2327 |
| color-scheme | light dark |
Links:
Viewport: width=device-width