Title: Allow easier array UDTs, such as `"INT64[3, 3]"` by eriknw · Pull Request #300 · python-graphblas/python-graphblas · GitHub
Open Graph Title: Allow easier array UDTs, such as `"INT64[3, 3]"` by eriknw · Pull Request #300 · python-graphblas/python-graphblas
X Title: Allow easier array UDTs, such as `"INT64[3, 3]"` by eriknw · Pull Request #300 · python-graphblas/python-graphblas
Description: This matches the "nicer" repr we have for array UDTs that we already have, so it should be natural to use. I'm always a little skeptical when extending what numpy does, but I think this is so much easier and more readable. Quick: can you create a valid numpy array dtype from memory?
Open Graph Description: This matches the "nicer" repr we have for array UDTs that we already have, so it should be natural to use. I'm always a little skeptical when extending what numpy does, but I think th...
X Description: This matches the "nicer" repr we have for array UDTs that we already have, so it should be natural to use. I'm always a little skeptical when extending what numpy does, bu...
Opengraph URL: https://github.com/python-graphblas/python-graphblas/pull/300
X: @github
Domain: github.com
| route-pattern | /:user_id/:repository/pull/:id/checks(.:format) |
| route-controller | pull_requests |
| route-action | checks |
| fetch-nonce | v2:7f804c36-8de4-acc9-391e-66b1ea4a1aff |
| current-catalog-service-hash | 87dc3bc62d9b466312751bfd5f889726f4f1337bdff4e8be7da7c93d6c00a25a |
| request-id | BA10:1320F9:649EA:844A9:698E5872 |
| html-safe-nonce | ee48c6651680b67f56929031f301f2108d1af05b17227209fe43818958895a60 |
| visitor-payload | eyJyZWZlcnJlciI6IiIsInJlcXVlc3RfaWQiOiJCQTEwOjEzMjBGOTo2NDlFQTo4NDRBOTo2OThFNTg3MiIsInZpc2l0b3JfaWQiOiIxODg3NzAxOTk0NTI2NjI3OTU0IiwicmVnaW9uX2VkZ2UiOiJpYWQiLCJyZWdpb25fcmVuZGVyIjoiaWFkIn0= |
| visitor-hmac | c5ac32877d38ab01a63fd9b679c1a9a41abe28473736cf774c32467339252241 |
| hovercard-subject-tag | pull_request:1095958405 |
| github-keyboard-shortcuts | repository,pull-request-list,pull-request-conversation,pull-request-files-changed,checks,copilot |
| google-site-verification | Apib7-x98H0j5cPqHWwSMm6dNU4GmODRoqxLiDzdx9I |
| octolytics-url | https://collector.github.com/github/collect |
| analytics-location | / |
| fb:app_id | 1401488693436528 |
| apple-itunes-app | app-id=1477376905, app-argument=https://github.com/python-graphblas/python-graphblas/pull/300/checks |
| twitter:image | https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2058401?s=400&v=4 |
| twitter:card | summary_large_image |
| og:image | https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2058401?s=400&v=4 |
| og:image:alt | This matches the "nicer" repr we have for array UDTs that we already have, so it should be natural to use. I'm always a little skeptical when extending what numpy does, but I think th... |
| og:site_name | GitHub |
| og:type | object |
| hostname | github.com |
| expected-hostname | github.com |
| None | 0e08b85f0035d49bc4c22868f70a4d30fb8c2a777936895c37e78df095242ddc |
| turbo-cache-control | no-preview |
| go-import | github.com/python-graphblas/python-graphblas git https://github.com/python-graphblas/python-graphblas.git |
| octolytics-dimension-user_id | 103965858 |
| octolytics-dimension-user_login | python-graphblas |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_id | 221014819 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_nwo | python-graphblas/python-graphblas |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_public | true |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_is_fork | false |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_id | 221014819 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_nwo | python-graphblas/python-graphblas |
| turbo-body-classes | logged-out env-production page-responsive full-width full-width-p-0 |
| disable-turbo | false |
| browser-stats-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/stats |
| browser-errors-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/errors |
| release | 9416d07f3607b074b276ccc81546278f89608a08 |
| ui-target | full |
| theme-color | #1e2327 |
| color-scheme | light dark |
Links:
Viewport: width=device-width