René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"Add flag to ignore 'Skipping analyzing ...'","articleBody":"**Pitch**\r\n\r\nCurrently `--ignore-missing-imports` silences all 3 different errors listed in [missing-imports](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/running_mypy.html?highlight=skipping%20analyzing#missing-imports), but [missing-type-hints-for-third-party-library](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/running_mypy.html?highlight=skipping%20analyzing#missing-type-hints-for-third-party-library) is closer to a warning than an error.\r\n\r\nThe current solution is to list the packages to ignore in a configuration file, which is particularly onerous when there are many packages being built and type-checked.\r\n\r\n**Feature**\r\n\r\nAdd a flag (eg. `--ignore-untyped-imports`) that either ignores this error, or downgrades it to a warning:\r\n```\r\nerror: Skipping analyzing X: found module but no type hints or library stubs\r\n```\r\n\r\nAlternatively:\r\n- the [unable-to-find-module](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/running_mypy.html?highlight=skipping%20analyzing#unable-to-find-module) error could be changed to no longer be skipped by `--ignore-missing-imports`, as that is nearly always a misconfiguration of mypy\r\n- each case could be guarded by a separate flag. \r\n\r\n**Implementation**\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/python/mypy/blob/master/mypy/build.py#L2410-L2411 and other references to `options.ignore_missing_imports` would need to be changed.","author":{"url":"https://github.com/mfarrugi","@type":"Person","name":"mfarrugi"},"datePublished":"2020-12-09T21:47:40Z","url":"https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/9789"}