René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"Reliable content for CompletionItem details field","articleBody":"In https://github.com/tomv564/LSP/pull/136 a user has decided they do not want to see the CompletionItem `details` because the content is unpredictable and most of the time repeats the `label` field's content:\r\n\r\n![screenshot](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16542113/31048209-1179a0c2-a619-11e7-9a8e-7e53bacc39cc.png)\r\n\r\nPyCharm elects to show the completion's module name in the 2nd column:\r\n\r\n\u003cimg width=\"457\" alt=\"screen shot 2017-10-01 at 09 47 06\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4395832/31052753-edc10fba-a68d-11e7-82a7-09eb7b6c3e9c.png\"\u003e\r\n\r\nThe protocol suggests the following about the content of the `detail` field:\r\n```typescript\r\n/**\r\n * A human-readable string with additional information\r\n * about this item, like type or symbol information.\r\n */\r\ndetail?: string;\r\n```\r\n\r\nThe Sublime LSP package will likely provide an option to always display \"kind\" instead of \"detail\". \r\n\r\nJedi's CompletionItem exposes a `module_name` field from BaseDefinition.\r\nSome `python-language-server` users may prefer this content in the \"detail\" field. \r\nWhat do you think?\r\n\r\n\r\n","author":{"url":"https://github.com/tomv564","@type":"Person","name":"tomv564"},"datePublished":"2017-10-01T09:03:43.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":7},"url":"https://github.com/149/python-language-server/issues/149"}