Title: Allow lower version of python-dateutil in generated client · Issue #298 · openapi-generators/openapi-python-client · GitHub
Open Graph Title: Allow lower version of python-dateutil in generated client · Issue #298 · openapi-generators/openapi-python-client
X Title: Allow lower version of python-dateutil in generated client · Issue #298 · openapi-generators/openapi-python-client
Description: Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Pretty selfish ask here, but we'd like to consider allowing a wider range of allowed python-dateutil, specifically allowing something below 2.8.1 in the generated client TOML...
Open Graph Description: Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Pretty selfish ask here, but we'd like to consider allowing a wider range of allowed python-dateutil, specifically allowing something ...
X Description: Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Pretty selfish ask here, but we'd like to consider allowing a wider range of allowed python-dateutil, specifically allowing someth...
Opengraph URL: https://github.com/openapi-generators/openapi-python-client/issues/298
X: @github
Domain: github.com
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"Allow lower version of python-dateutil in generated client","articleBody":"**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**\r\n\r\nPretty selfish ask here, but we'd like to consider allowing a wider range of allowed `python-dateutil`, specifically allowing something below `2.8.1` in the generated client TOML.\r\n\r\nSome of our internal tooling which uses both our generated openapi client and aws-sam-cli is incompatible due to a dependency conflict. Specifically, aws-sam-cli requires python-dateutil \u003c 2.8.1. We asked about expanding the acceptable range in aws-sam-cli, since the `.1` patch version in particular seems arbitrary and were [basically told to pound sand](https://github.com/aws/aws-sam-cli/issues/2277).\r\n\r\nI know this is pretty esoteric to our individual use case, but thought I'd ask.\r\n\r\n**Describe the solution you'd like**\r\n\r\nSupport a more permissive range of python-dateutil under 2.8.1.\r\n\r\n**Describe alternatives you've considered**\r\n\r\nWe can either make this change in our fork directly - which I was hoping to avoid because I'd like to be able to soon ignore our fork and just use the dependency as is - or continue an internal workaround we have around not using the tooling that causes the dependency conflict.\r\n","author":{"url":"https://github.com/bowenwr","@type":"Person","name":"bowenwr"},"datePublished":"2021-01-13T20:56:55.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":1},"url":"https://github.com/298/openapi-python-client/issues/298"}
| route-pattern | /_view_fragments/issues/show/:user_id/:repository/:id/issue_layout(.:format) |
| route-controller | voltron_issues_fragments |
| route-action | issue_layout |
| fetch-nonce | v2:53330c4b-3224-cffb-ccd0-2613283f334a |
| current-catalog-service-hash | 81bb79d38c15960b92d99bca9288a9108c7a47b18f2423d0f6438c5b7bcd2114 |
| request-id | D506:398A3A:C5BF009:FD64E8A:697F551C |
| html-safe-nonce | 2682e985d779477bd4dd516a27d624d2091982f8e933da47c6db1a13966a898b |
| visitor-payload | eyJyZWZlcnJlciI6IiIsInJlcXVlc3RfaWQiOiJENTA2OjM5OEEzQTpDNUJGMDA5OkZENjRFOEE6Njk3RjU1MUMiLCJ2aXNpdG9yX2lkIjoiOTEwMTM4NTYwODY4NDU5MDM2NCIsInJlZ2lvbl9lZGdlIjoiaWFkIiwicmVnaW9uX3JlbmRlciI6ImlhZCJ9 |
| visitor-hmac | 1fe9ff4789e3fa6321973a9e36ba1be9b3301dd03f7115b9f6229a0631f7769b |
| hovercard-subject-tag | issue:785451505 |
| github-keyboard-shortcuts | repository,issues,copilot |
| google-site-verification | Apib7-x98H0j5cPqHWwSMm6dNU4GmODRoqxLiDzdx9I |
| octolytics-url | https://collector.github.com/github/collect |
| analytics-location | / |
| fb:app_id | 1401488693436528 |
| apple-itunes-app | app-id=1477376905, app-argument=https://github.com/_view_fragments/issues/show/openapi-generators/openapi-python-client/298/issue_layout |
| twitter:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/0712ad3d8bc0961fd2804014b5a6da0119b0d037b9c49549d8e687719ceeb92b/openapi-generators/openapi-python-client/issues/298 |
| twitter:card | summary_large_image |
| og:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/0712ad3d8bc0961fd2804014b5a6da0119b0d037b9c49549d8e687719ceeb92b/openapi-generators/openapi-python-client/issues/298 |
| og:image:alt | Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Pretty selfish ask here, but we'd like to consider allowing a wider range of allowed python-dateutil, specifically allowing something ... |
| og:image:width | 1200 |
| og:image:height | 600 |
| og:site_name | GitHub |
| og:type | object |
| og:author:username | bowenwr |
| hostname | github.com |
| expected-hostname | github.com |
| None | 60279d4097367e16897439d16d6bbe4180663db828c666eeed2656988ffe59f6 |
| turbo-cache-control | no-preview |
| go-import | github.com/openapi-generators/openapi-python-client git https://github.com/openapi-generators/openapi-python-client.git |
| octolytics-dimension-user_id | 84925606 |
| octolytics-dimension-user_login | openapi-generators |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_id | 240776275 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_nwo | openapi-generators/openapi-python-client |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_public | true |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_is_fork | false |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_id | 240776275 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_nwo | openapi-generators/openapi-python-client |
| turbo-body-classes | logged-out env-production page-responsive |
| disable-turbo | false |
| browser-stats-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/stats |
| browser-errors-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/errors |
| release | 7c85641c598ad130c74f7bcc27f58575cac69551 |
| ui-target | full |
| theme-color | #1e2327 |
| color-scheme | light dark |
Links:
Viewport: width=device-width