René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"writeFileSync `data` as `Object` throws type error despite docs listing Object as a supported type","articleBody":"* **Version**: `14.17.0` \u0026 `16.4.0`\r\n* **Platform**: `local 20.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 20.5.0: Sat May  8 05:10:31 PDT 2021; root:xnu-7195.121.3~9/RELEASE_ARM64_T8101 arm64`\r\n* **Subsystem**: FS / Docs\r\n\r\n### What steps will reproduce the bug?\r\n\r\n```js\r\nimport { writeFileSync } from 'fs';\r\n\r\nwriteFileSync('test.log', { foo: 'bar' });\r\n```\r\n\r\n### How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?\r\n\r\n100% (no special conditions)\r\n\r\n### What is the expected behavior?\r\n\r\nThe type(s) for `data` listed in the docs to work.\r\n\r\n### What do you see instead?\r\n\r\n```\r\nTypeError [ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE]: The \"data\" argument must be of type string or an\r\ninstance of Buffer, TypedArray, or DataView. Received an instance of Object\r\n    at writeFileSync (node:fs:2136:5)\r\n```\r\n\r\n### Additional information\r\n\r\nfs docs for [14.x](https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v14.x/api/fs.html#fs_fs_writefilesync_file_data_options) and [16.x](https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v16.x/api/fs.html#fs_fs_writefilesync_file_data_options) both include `\u003cObject\u003e` as a type for writeFileSync's `data` argument:\r\n\r\n\u003e `data` `\u003cstring\u003e` | `\u003cBuffer\u003e` | `\u003cTypedArray\u003e` | `\u003cDataView\u003e` | `\u003cObject\u003e`","author":{"url":"https://github.com/JakobJingleheimer","@type":"Person","name":"JakobJingleheimer"},"datePublished":"2021-06-25T15:08:23.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":8},"url":"https://github.com/39152/node/issues/39152"}