René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"Re-vendor node/node-gyp --\u003e tools/gyp/","articleBody":"As discussed at https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28537#issuecomment-508724824, in order to keep advancing towards Python 3 compatibility, we should re-vendor the repo [__node/node-gyp__](https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp) --\u003e this repo's [__tools/gyp/__](https://github.com/nodejs/node/tree/master/tools/gyp) directory.\r\n\r\nWhat is the best approach for vendoring in?\r\n\r\n\u003c!--\r\nThank you for suggesting an idea to make Node.js better.\r\n\r\nPlease fill in as much of the template below as you're able.\r\n--\u003e\r\n\r\n**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**\r\nPlease describe the problem you are trying to solve.\r\nNode.js does not yet build on Python 3 and Python 2 EOL is in \u003c 6 months.\r\n\r\n**Describe the solution you'd like**\r\nPlease describe the desired behavior.\r\nNode.js builds on Python 3.\r\n\r\n**Describe alternatives you've considered**\r\nPlease describe alternative solutions or features you have considered.\r\nGoing kitesurfing.","author":{"url":"https://github.com/cclauss","@type":"Person","name":"cclauss"},"datePublished":"2019-07-05T12:45:17.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":6},"url":"https://github.com/28555/node/issues/28555"}