Title: Fix tree.walk() and add test by jdgarcia · Pull Request #929 · nodegit/nodegit · GitHub
Open Graph Title: Fix tree.walk() and add test by jdgarcia · Pull Request #929 · nodegit/nodegit
X Title: Fix tree.walk() and add test by jdgarcia · Pull Request #929 · nodegit/nodegit
Description: Native Node bindings to Git. Contribute to nodegit/nodegit development by creating an account on GitHub.
Open Graph Description: Fix for #928 This is the non-api breaking change. How does anyone feel about changing walk to return a promise (with a progress callback) instead of an event emitter? (ex: tree.walk().then(entries ...
X Description: Fix for #928 This is the non-api breaking change. How does anyone feel about changing walk to return a promise (with a progress callback) instead of an event emitter? (ex: tree.walk().then(entries ...
Opengraph URL: https://github.com/nodegit/nodegit/pull/929
X: @github
Domain: github.com
| route-pattern | /:user_id/:repository/pull/:id/commits(.:format) |
| route-controller | pull_requests |
| route-action | commits |
| fetch-nonce | v2:94d0cc00-96a0-c8a6-76e7-5d6c239ec87b |
| current-catalog-service-hash | ae870bc5e265a340912cde392f23dad3671a0a881730ffdadd82f2f57d81641b |
| request-id | EB8C:3D0306:1AB48AB:2585179:6A5FB61E |
| html-safe-nonce | 1c8ce8bf01d426451a1252327463b22a783852d0d582503c4bed8ec41e70b537 |
| visitor-payload | eyJyZWZlcnJlciI6IiIsInJlcXVlc3RfaWQiOiJFQjhDOjNEMDMwNjoxQUI0OEFCOjI1ODUxNzk6NkE1RkI2MUUiLCJ2aXNpdG9yX2lkIjoiNzYzNzUwMjU2MTk4NzA0ODk5MCIsInJlZ2lvbl9lZGdlIjoiaWFkIiwicmVnaW9uX3JlbmRlciI6ImlhZCJ9 |
| visitor-hmac | a7e7824e1dd41562e508ecf057097746956aa8bd979448af1a6027ea4765e22d |
| hovercard-subject-tag | pull_request:61129443 |
| github-keyboard-shortcuts | repository,pull-request-list,pull-request-conversation,pull-request-files-changed,copilot |
| google-site-verification | Apib7-x98H0j5cPqHWwSMm6dNU4GmODRoqxLiDzdx9I |
| octolytics-url | https://collector.github.com/github/collect |
| analytics-location | / |
| fb:app_id | 1401488693436528 |
| apple-itunes-app | app-id=1477376905, app-argument=https://github.com/nodegit/nodegit/pull/929/commits |
| twitter:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/8ef0f5a9b1a65e4035d52ef9b2daa341fe982dbcf4a908ecb1f3e307a3f69828/nodegit/nodegit/pull/929 |
| twitter:card | summary_large_image |
| og:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/8ef0f5a9b1a65e4035d52ef9b2daa341fe982dbcf4a908ecb1f3e307a3f69828/nodegit/nodegit/pull/929 |
| og:image:alt | Fix for #928 This is the non-api breaking change. How does anyone feel about changing walk to return a promise (with a progress callback) instead of an event emitter? (ex: tree.walk().then(entries ... |
| og:image:width | 1200 |
| og:image:height | 600 |
| og:site_name | GitHub |
| og:type | object |
| og:author:username | jdgarcia |
| hostname | github.com |
| expected-hostname | github.com |
| None | e0cfc367faf9c4c774d2a903897aa214c786247c4f45ffcee48cda2b819fb0c8 |
| turbo-cache-control | no-cache |
| go-import | github.com/nodegit/nodegit git https://github.com/nodegit/nodegit.git |
| octolytics-dimension-user_id | 657068 |
| octolytics-dimension-user_login | nodegit |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_id | 1383170 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_nwo | nodegit/nodegit |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_public | true |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_is_fork | false |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_id | 1383170 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_nwo | nodegit/nodegit |
| turbo-body-classes | logged-out env-production page-responsive |
| disable-turbo | false |
| browser-stats-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/stats |
| browser-errors-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/errors |
| release | 94569c859bc88d6bf7de7e0ce3f2a11cd529a131 |
| ui-target | full |
| theme-color | #1e2327 |
| color-scheme | light dark |
Links:
Viewport: width=device-width