Title: Fix tree.walk() and add test by jdgarcia · Pull Request #929 · nodegit/nodegit · GitHub
Open Graph Title: Fix tree.walk() and add test by jdgarcia · Pull Request #929 · nodegit/nodegit
X Title: Fix tree.walk() and add test by jdgarcia · Pull Request #929 · nodegit/nodegit
Description: Native Node bindings to Git. Contribute to nodegit/nodegit development by creating an account on GitHub.
Open Graph Description: Fix for #928 This is the non-api breaking change. How does anyone feel about changing walk to return a promise (with a progress callback) instead of an event emitter? (ex: tree.walk().then(entries ...
X Description: Fix for #928 This is the non-api breaking change. How does anyone feel about changing walk to return a promise (with a progress callback) instead of an event emitter? (ex: tree.walk().then(entries ...
Opengraph URL: https://github.com/nodegit/nodegit/pull/929
X: @github
Domain: github.com
| route-pattern | /:user_id/:repository/pull/:id/checks(.:format) |
| route-controller | pull_requests |
| route-action | checks |
| fetch-nonce | v2:22e9f9f7-f42f-d2ce-c8fe-53197b3975e9 |
| current-catalog-service-hash | 87dc3bc62d9b466312751bfd5f889726f4f1337bdff4e8be7da7c93d6c00a25a |
| request-id | B664:366D7D:3B2720:4D567F:6A5FF156 |
| html-safe-nonce | 613c05b7fbeb9c689d223c8e9b4f6a6f2af06b829a2c3becb82898dde0f3bb2d |
| visitor-payload | eyJyZWZlcnJlciI6IiIsInJlcXVlc3RfaWQiOiJCNjY0OjM2NkQ3RDozQjI3MjA6NEQ1NjdGOjZBNUZGMTU2IiwidmlzaXRvcl9pZCI6Ijc2OTY4ODYyMjcyMjU1Mzg5MDIiLCJyZWdpb25fZWRnZSI6ImlhZCIsInJlZ2lvbl9yZW5kZXIiOiJpYWQifQ== |
| visitor-hmac | 6daf33bd60b20de418a7734de9150d7d0dcb781a291753870cce8a0c910bbbd0 |
| hovercard-subject-tag | pull_request:61129443 |
| github-keyboard-shortcuts | repository,pull-request-list,pull-request-conversation,pull-request-files-changed,checks,copilot |
| google-site-verification | Apib7-x98H0j5cPqHWwSMm6dNU4GmODRoqxLiDzdx9I |
| octolytics-url | https://collector.github.com/github/collect |
| analytics-location | / |
| fb:app_id | 1401488693436528 |
| apple-itunes-app | app-id=1477376905, app-argument=https://github.com/nodegit/nodegit/pull/929/checks |
| twitter:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/8ef0f5a9b1a65e4035d52ef9b2daa341fe982dbcf4a908ecb1f3e307a3f69828/nodegit/nodegit/pull/929 |
| twitter:card | summary_large_image |
| og:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/8ef0f5a9b1a65e4035d52ef9b2daa341fe982dbcf4a908ecb1f3e307a3f69828/nodegit/nodegit/pull/929 |
| og:image:alt | Fix for #928 This is the non-api breaking change. How does anyone feel about changing walk to return a promise (with a progress callback) instead of an event emitter? (ex: tree.walk().then(entries ... |
| og:image:width | 1200 |
| og:image:height | 600 |
| og:site_name | GitHub |
| og:type | object |
| og:author:username | jdgarcia |
| hostname | github.com |
| expected-hostname | github.com |
| None | ec26f1a08b78b3d576999ee8b45a2abc017c95dbee903a8019940cd2e9bf7b3d |
| turbo-cache-control | no-cache |
| go-import | github.com/nodegit/nodegit git https://github.com/nodegit/nodegit.git |
| octolytics-dimension-user_id | 657068 |
| octolytics-dimension-user_login | nodegit |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_id | 1383170 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_nwo | nodegit/nodegit |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_public | true |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_is_fork | false |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_id | 1383170 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_nwo | nodegit/nodegit |
| turbo-body-classes | logged-out env-production page-responsive |
| disable-turbo | false |
| browser-stats-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/stats |
| browser-errors-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/errors |
| release | 0a29f0b91ade2368fc0b74327c0f64ec1f98f5ff |
| ui-target | full |
| theme-color | #1e2327 |
| color-scheme | light dark |
Links:
Viewport: width=device-width