René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"[Bug] Extending a boolean literal results in SyntaxError","articleBody":"\u003c!-- Love javascript-obfuscator? Please consider supporting our collective:\r\n👉  https://opencollective.com/javascript-obfuscator/donate --\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003c!--- Provide a general summary of the issue in the Title above --\u003e\r\nWhen the input code contains a class that extends a boolean literal, the output code results in SyntaxError.\r\n\r\n## Expected Behavior\r\nObfuscating the following code should output a valid program.\r\n```js\r\nclass C extends true {}\r\n```\r\n\r\n## Current Behavior\r\nThe obfuscated code throws SyntaxError. (Early error)\r\n```js\r\nclass C extends![]{}\r\n```\r\n\r\n## Steps to Reproduce\r\n\u003c!--- Provide a link to a live example, or an unambiguous set of steps to --\u003e\r\n\u003c!--- reproduce this bug. Include code to reproduce, if relevant --\u003e\r\n1. Obfuscate the following program using https://obfuscator.io\r\n\r\n## Your Environment\r\n\u003c!--- Include as many relevant details about the environment you experienced the bug in --\u003e\r\n* Obfuscator version used: https://obfuscator.io\r\n* Node version used: v16.9.1\r\n\r\n# Stack trace\r\n\u003c!--- Include stack trace --\u003e\r\n\r\n## Minimal working example that will help to reproduce issue\r\n\u003c!--- Include code --\u003e\r\n","author":{"url":"https://github.com/f52985","@type":"Person","name":"f52985"},"datePublished":"2022-11-05T16:28:08.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":0},"url":"https://github.com/1131/javascript-obfuscator/issues/1131"}