René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"client scope optimization doesn't work if `all` scope is dummy or unknown","articleBody":"try the todo example, with prerendering off and then in Todo model:\r\n\r\n```ruby\r\nclass Todo \u003c ApplicationRecord\r\n  scope :completed, -\u003e () { where(completed: true)  }, client: -\u003e { completed }\r\n  scope :active,    -\u003e () { where(completed: false) }, client: -\u003e { !completed }\r\nend\r\n```\r\n\r\n\r\nLoad the all scope, notice that the active todo count sticks at one,\r\nthen when we look at the active scope, it only contains one (wrong usually) item.\r\n\r\nProblem is occuring because on the footer we do a count of the active scope.  Presumably this causes the completed client side scoping rule to be run, but on the dummy 'all' scope.\r\n\r\nIf you remove the footer the problem goes away.\r\n\r\n\r\n","author":{"url":"https://github.com/catmando","@type":"Person","name":"catmando"},"datePublished":"2018-12-06T23:34:02.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":4},"url":"https://github.com/78/hyperstack/issues/78"}