René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"More concise`dom_node` and `ref` handling for jquery","articleBody":"currently you can grab a components ref mapped to jquery using the `dom` keyword:\r\n\r\n`INPUT(dom: set(:_input) ... )`\r\n\r\nit works just like `ref`, but the resulting value is wrapped by jQuery.\r\n\r\nhowever if you say `self.dom_node` you get your own ref, and if you want jQuery you say `DOM[dom_node]`\r\n\r\nSeems not very symmetrical.\r\n\r\nI am suggesting we do something like this:\r\n\r\n`dom` keyword -\u003e jQuery wrapped reference\r\n`ref` keyword -\u003e reference\r\n\r\n`self.dom` -\u003e jQuery wrapped reference to self\r\n`self.ref` -\u003e straight dom reference to self.\r\n\r\nand that is the problem ... its sort of backwards.\r\n\r\nSo alternative proposal:\r\n\r\n`dom` keyword is synonym for `ref`\r\n`jq` keyword is `ref/dom` wrapped by jquery\r\n\r\nlikewise `self.dom` is ref to yourself and\r\n`self.jq` is your self wrapped by jquery\r\n\r\nAny other ideas for a pair of names that could be used consistently in both places?\r\n","author":{"url":"https://github.com/catmando","@type":"Person","name":"catmando"},"datePublished":"2018-11-16T06:10:38.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":6},"url":"https://github.com/62/hyperstack/issues/62"}