René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"https://github.blog/changelog/2025-07-21-code-scanning-will-stop-combining-multiple-sarif-runs-uploaded-in-the-same-sarif-file/ broke all scan tools","articleBody":"Have used _CodeQL_ for 2 years (without config files), all commits passed.\nBut https://github.blog/changelog/2025-07-21-code-scanning-will-stop-combining-multiple-sarif-runs-uploaded-in-the-same-sarif-file/ broke https://github.com/codacy/codacy-analysis-cli/ (https://github.com/codacy/codacy-analysis-cli/issues/541), so [_Codacy_ was removed](https://github.com/SwuduSusuwu/SusuLib/commit/5725afb79dbed571f09434e1ddf20c01e675f95f), which caused `Exit code was 32 and last log line was: CodeQL detected code written in C/C++, but not any written in GitHub Actions.` (guess the reason is that there were no other config files for _GitHub Actions_ in `.github/workflows/`, but if so this new \"error\" is a regression, since _CodeQL_ used to allow to use the default setup).\n\nTo workaround, used https://github.com/github/codeql/blob/main/.github/codeql/codeql-config.yml + https://github.com/github/codeql/blob/main/.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml (just as templates; [replaced the directories + languages with those](https://github.com/SwuduSusuwu/SusuLib/commit/a367e84294abf884674e466a1ee991359cda7686) which [`SusuLib`](https://github.com/SwuduSusuwu/SusuLib/) uses), but those config files trigger `CodeQL analyses from advanced configurations cannot be processed when the default setup is enabled`.\n\nIs the sole solution to have _CodeQL_ removed too? If so, are there other tools to use (which were not broken), or must produce scan tools from scratch now?","author":{"url":"https://github.com/SwuduSusuwu","@type":"Person","name":"SwuduSusuwu"},"datePublished":"2025-07-22T17:57:44.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":2},"url":"https://github.com/2985/codeql-action/issues/2985"}