Title: [WIP] Java: Improve CWE 295 by intrigus-lgtm · Pull Request #4536 · github/codeql · GitHub
Open Graph Title: [WIP] Java: Improve CWE 295 by intrigus-lgtm · Pull Request #4536 · github/codeql
X Title: [WIP] Java: Improve CWE 295 by intrigus-lgtm · Pull Request #4536 · github/codeql
Description: CodeQL: the libraries and queries that power security researchers around the world, as well as code scanning in GitHub Advanced Security - [WIP] Java: Improve CWE 295 by intrigus-lgtm · Pull Request #4536 · github/codeql
Open Graph Description: Continuation of #3581 @smowton what do you think about the approach? I.e. using data flow and splitting everything into unsafe trustmanager, trust-all hostname verifier, and missing SSL endpoint in...
X Description: Continuation of #3581 @smowton what do you think about the approach? I.e. using data flow and splitting everything into unsafe trustmanager, trust-all hostname verifier, and missing SSL endpoint in...
Opengraph URL: https://github.com/github/codeql/pull/4536
X: @github
Domain: github.com
| route-pattern | /:user_id/:repository/pull/:id/checks(.:format) |
| route-controller | pull_requests |
| route-action | checks |
| fetch-nonce | v2:1ec57270-8bf0-f130-9da1-2aabb5726255 |
| current-catalog-service-hash | 87dc3bc62d9b466312751bfd5f889726f4f1337bdff4e8be7da7c93d6c00a25a |
| request-id | 8F76:EF59:196C21:2CAE13:6A4D4F0E |
| html-safe-nonce | 81725133f140e4fc8ae83901e4855359ca7d85b82b84a17a49788fd295624778 |
| visitor-payload | eyJyZWZlcnJlciI6IiIsInJlcXVlc3RfaWQiOiI4Rjc2OkVGNTk6MTk2QzIxOjJDQUUxMzo2QTRENEYwRSIsInZpc2l0b3JfaWQiOiI2NDU2NzI0NjU5NzA2MzUxMzc0IiwicmVnaW9uX2VkZ2UiOiJpYWQiLCJyZWdpb25fcmVuZGVyIjoiaWFkIn0= |
| visitor-hmac | 29536b79dc7fe51c91bded8567e45575b6a3e05bc3aefec71f73a90a1fa2835b |
| hovercard-subject-tag | pull_request:507879640 |
| github-keyboard-shortcuts | repository,pull-request-list,pull-request-conversation,pull-request-files-changed,checks,copilot |
| google-site-verification | Apib7-x98H0j5cPqHWwSMm6dNU4GmODRoqxLiDzdx9I |
| octolytics-url | https://collector.github.com/github/collect |
| analytics-location | / |
| fb:app_id | 1401488693436528 |
| apple-itunes-app | app-id=1477376905, app-argument=https://github.com/github/codeql/pull/4536/checks |
| twitter:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/9acef39e3be8f06a14235fd9cef75d93dd75268ac8a6e8d3858b262982e5ac86/github/codeql/pull/4536 |
| twitter:card | summary_large_image |
| og:image | https://opengraph.githubassets.com/9acef39e3be8f06a14235fd9cef75d93dd75268ac8a6e8d3858b262982e5ac86/github/codeql/pull/4536 |
| og:image:alt | Continuation of #3581 @smowton what do you think about the approach? I.e. using data flow and splitting everything into unsafe trustmanager, trust-all hostname verifier, and missing SSL endpoint in... |
| og:image:width | 1200 |
| og:image:height | 600 |
| og:site_name | GitHub |
| og:type | object |
| og:author:username | intrigus-lgtm |
| hostname | github.com |
| expected-hostname | github.com |
| None | 92571a8944142227b7e19cd10918b1ddd06e5066c1ad5bc7e4769cf6140a87e6 |
| turbo-cache-control | no-cache |
| go-import | github.com/github/codeql git https://github.com/github/codeql.git |
| octolytics-dimension-user_id | 9919 |
| octolytics-dimension-user_login | github |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_id | 143040428 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_nwo | github/codeql |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_public | true |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_is_fork | false |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_id | 143040428 |
| octolytics-dimension-repository_network_root_nwo | github/codeql |
| turbo-body-classes | logged-out env-production page-responsive |
| disable-turbo | false |
| browser-stats-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/stats |
| browser-errors-url | https://api.github.com/_private/browser/errors |
| release | 56fc8347865a14e2ec811533d68f929cf4e0ec19 |
| ui-target | full |
| theme-color | #1e2327 |
| color-scheme | light dark |
Links:
Viewport: width=device-width