René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"const may not be correct afterall.","articleBody":"https://github.com/codereport/An-Algorithm-Library/blob/1a94a025ad0a187cc0fd39bb6bcbc9a5791338b2/src/aal/algorithm.hpp#L9\r\n\r\nIf the user is using a `mutable` lambda. Then they can't use the algorithm. So might need to remove const from these.\r\n\r\nWe might want to test a mutable lambda to see if it's working as expected. like `[x=0]` and `++x` to make sure all the functions are correctly incrementing the value.\r\n\r\nThough it should be fine I did some testing with [compiler explorer](https://www.godbolt.org/z/8hrb3aaTb). So I understand. The last function in the call will get the one that will increment because they are all pass by value.\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/codereport/An-Algorithm-Library/blob/1a94a025ad0a187cc0fd39bb6bcbc9a5791338b2/src/aal/algorithm.hpp#L19 Here we could forward the value to find. It might be better since any_of isn't actually calling the lambda. ","author":{"url":"https://github.com/Sebanisu","@type":"Person","name":"Sebanisu"},"datePublished":"2021-06-21T16:12:38.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":0},"url":"https://github.com/13/An-Algorithm-Library/issues/13"}