René's URL Explorer Experiment

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"DiscussionForumPosting","headline":"python3: a # in an f-string breaks syntax highlighting","articleBody":"See the code below.  Since my issue exists on github, I can simply demonstrate my exact issue with the example code block below.  Basically, when a # is used within an f-string, then it appears to break the syntax highlighting.  It looks like the \"#\" in the f-string gets interpreted as the start of a comment, even though this is correctly handled for non-f-srings.  The # in the format string is used to get the alternate form for the hex conversion.  Here is an example of what the \"#\" does in a format string as well as demonstrate the bug:\r\n\r\n```python\r\n\u003e\u003e\u003e # syntax highlighting works here...\r\n\u003e\u003e\u003e i = 5\r\n\u003e\u003e\u003e '{:#04x}'.format(i)   # \u003c-- not using an f-string is fine\r\n'0x05'\r\n\u003e\u003e\u003e f'{i:04x}'\r\n'0005'\r\n\u003e\u003e\u003e f'{i:#04x}'           # \u003c---- this line breaks the syntax highlighting\r\n'0x05'\r\n\u003e\u003e\u003e f'{i:04x}'            # \u003c-- syntax highlighting is broken!\r\n'0005'\r\n\u003e\u003e\u003e '{:#04x}'.format(i)   # \u003c-- syntax highlighting is broken!\r\n'0x05'\r\n\u003e\u003e\u003e \r\n```\r\n\r\nHere is a screenshot to demonstrate the issue (for future reference) since, after this bug is fixed, the code above will presumably have the correct highlighting:\r\n\r\n\r\n![Screenshot from 2020-11-26 01-22-51](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/31610422/100332203-f6a38700-2f85-11eb-9032-076dbd477e97.png)\r\n\r\nEdit: corrected the 4th output from `0x05` to `0005`","author":{"url":"https://github.com/Spectre5","@type":"Person","name":"Spectre5"},"datePublished":"2020-11-12T01:53:58.000Z","interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":"https://schema.org/CommentAction","userInteractionCount":6},"url":"https://github.com/225/MagicPython/issues/225"}